Many organizations are actively comparing Cyberhaven competitors to find smarter, faster, and more scalable data protection. With cloud apps, AI tools, and remote endpoints increasing exposure risks, evaluating cybersecurity solutions has become a strategic priority. These modern platforms go beyond traditional monitoring to deliver real-time data visibility, policy enforcement, and compliance automation. Whether you’re securing SaaS, cloud, or GenAI environments, exploring top Cyberhaven competitors will help your team identify solutions that strengthen cybersecurity posture, reduce data loss, and ensure complete compliance coverage in 2025.
Sensitive data lives in Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Snowflake, email, browsers, and GenAI tools—expanding the attack surface and heightening breach risk. Regulatory frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOC 2 demand provable discovery, policy enforcement, and remediation. A modern DLP solution must protect data everywhere—SaaS, cloud, GenAI, browsers, and endpoints—without slowing teams down.
Organizations often report complex integrations with legacy systems that slow deployments and increase services cost. Pricing can be steep for SMBs because the platform targets large enterprises. Customization may feel limited in highly regulated workflows that need very specific controls. Support can be uneven during critical rollout or troubleshooting windows. Buyers therefore compare alternatives that offer faster setup, richer SaaS/GenAI coverage, inline remediation, and transparent pricing.
Prioritize real-time monitoring and protection, a cloud-native architecture with broad SaaS integrations, granular policies with strong customizability, and easy implementation that scales. Accuracy enhancers like ML/OCR for images and PDFs, plus inline actions (redact, mask, block, encrypt, quarantine) are must-haves to reduce noise and stop leaks immediately.
Modern data moves across SaaS, cloud, GenAI, and endpoints. Strac unifies DSPM + DLP to discover and classify sensitive data and then enforce policies with inline remediation.
Key features
Pros
Cons
Conversion assets: Request a demo | Contact Strac
Strong for teams that want quick AI-based detection in SaaS via OAuth.
Key features
Pros: Quick to connect; solid SaaS focus.
Cons: May need other tools for posture, deep remediation, or data stores.
Well-suited for large enterprises that need risk-adaptive controls tied to user behavior.
Key features
Pros: Deep analytics and control breadth.
Cons: Heavier deployment; longer time-to-value.
Combines secure internet access with DNS/SWG enforcement.
Key features
Pros: Strong for distributed workforces at the network edge.
Cons: Less granular, app-native remediation versus SaaS-specialist DLP.
A mature, comprehensive option spanning endpoint, network, and email.
Key features
Pros: Depth across traditional estates and complex workflows.
Cons: Complex to deploy/manage; slower to modern SaaS/AI use cases.
Great when email is the primary exfiltration channel and user coaching is important.
Key features
Pros: Excellent email controls and user education.
Cons: Broader SaaS/GenAI posture may need complements.
CASB/SSE-first approach providing inline controls for cloud and web traffic.
Key features
Pros: Strong for cloud/web traffic control at scale.
Cons: App-native inline remediation may trail SaaS-focused DLP platforms.
Map your riskiest workflows (Slack PHI, Drive PCI, Zendesk PII, Snowflake SSNs, ChatGPT prompts) and compliance mandates.
Favor vendors that connect quickly via OAuth/API and cover SaaS, cloud stores, GenAI, browsers, and endpoints without heavy agents.
Balance price with breadth of coverage and inline remediation. Strac stands out for unifying DSPM + DLP, delivering real-time protection, and offering a fast, agentless rollout that fits both growth companies and enterprises.
Who does Cyberhaven compete with?
Cyberhaven competes with modern DLP and DSPM vendors that offer broader SaaS, cloud, and GenAI coverage. Its top Cyberhaven competitors include Strac, Nightfall AI, Forcepoint, Symantec, Proofpoint, Cisco Umbrella, and Netskope. Among these, Strac stands out for real-time redaction, masking, and encryption across SaaS, cloud, endpoints, and AI tools—making it one of the strongest Cyberhaven competitors cybersecurity solutions for 2025.
What industries does Cyberhaven serve?
Cyberhaven primarily serves large enterprises in financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and technology that require strict data governance. However, many smaller organizations find it challenging to justify the cost and complexity. In contrast, Cyberhaven competitors cybersecurity solutions like Strac deliver enterprise-grade protection at a fraction of the complexity—ideal for SMBs, fintechs, SaaS companies, and compliance-heavy industries.
What is the best DLP solution?
The best DLP solution depends on your environment and compliance needs—but in 2025, Strac is emerging as the top Cyberhaven competitor. It combines agentless DSPM + DLP, offering discovery, classification, and inline remediation across SaaS, cloud, GenAI, browsers, and endpoints. Unlike legacy systems, Strac acts in real time—redacting PHI in Slack, masking PCI in Gmail, and fixing risky Drive shares automatically. For most organizations looking at Cyberhaven competitors cybersecurity, Strac delivers the fastest ROI, simplest rollout, and most complete coverage.
.avif){kind=icon}
.gif)
.webp)
