Top 12 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software Vendors in 2026

When companies search for DLP software vendors, they are not looking for another long comparison chart. They are trying to figure out one thing: Who will actually protect our data without slowing us down?

The problem is the market is noisy. Some vendors are heavy, agent-based, and take months to deploy. Others only send alerts but do not fix the issue. Meanwhile, sensitive data is no longer just in email. It is in Slack threads, Salesforce tickets, Google Drive files, Snowflake tables, and even AI prompts.

At Strac, we built our platform around how data actually moves today. We combine DSPM and DLP in one agentless solution that discovers, classifies, and automatically redacts sensitive data in real time across SaaS, cloud, endpoints, and AI tools.

In this guide, we break down the leading DLP software vendors, what truly separates them, and how to evaluate them based on deployment speed, remediation depth, AI coverage, and overall practicality. If you are comparing vendors, this will help you cut through the noise and make a decision that holds up in production.

✨ What is Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software?

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software detects, monitors, and protects sensitive data from unauthorized access, sharing, or exfiltration. DLP solutions identify sensitive information — such as personally identifiable information (PII), payment card data (PCI), protected health information (PHI), intellectual property, and credentials — and enforce policies to prevent data leaks.

Modern DLP solutions operate across multiple channels:

• Endpoint DLP — Monitors data on laptops, desktops, and mobile devices
• Network DLP — Inspects data in motion across network traffic
• Cloud DLP — Protects data in SaaS applications and cloud storage
• Email DLP — Scans email content and attachments for sensitive data

The best DLP platforms combine multiple approaches for comprehensive coverage across the entire data lifecycle.

🎥 What to Look for in DLP Software

When you’re evaluating DLP software vendors, it’s easy to get distracted by feature lists and bold claims. What really matters is simple: will this tool protect your data in the way your business actually operates?

Look beyond basic detection. Does the vendor only send alerts, or can it automatically redact, block, or fix the issue? Is deployment going to take months and heavy agents, or can you get up and running quickly? And does it protect just email and endpoints, or the full SaaS stack where your data actually lives today; Slack, Salesforce, Google Drive, cloud storage, even AI tools?

The right DLP vendor should reduce risk without creating friction. In the next section, we break down exactly what to look for before making your decision.

Here are the most important elements you need to search for:

Data Discovery and Classification

Effective DLP starts with knowing where sensitive data exists. Look for solutions that:

• Automatically discover sensitive data across endpoints, cloud, and SaaS
• Classify data by type (PII, PCI, PHI) and sensitivity level
• Support custom data patterns specific to your organization
• Use machine learning for context-aware classification

Policy Creation and Enforcement

DLP policies define what actions are allowed or blocked. Evaluate:

• Pre-built policy templates for HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR
• Flexibility to create custom policies
• Granular controls by user, group, application, or data type
• Options to warn, block, encrypt, redact, or quarantine

Real-Time Monitoring and Protection

DLP must act in real time to prevent breaches:

• Inline scanning before data leaves endpoints or networks
• Real-time alerts for policy violations
• Automatic remediation (redaction, blocking, quarantine)
• Offline protection for endpoints

Deployment and Integration

Consider how the solution fits your environment:

• Cloud-native vs on-prem deployment
• Integration with SIEM, SOAR, IAM
• SaaS coverage (Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365)
• APIs for custom workflows

User Experience and Administration

DLP shouldn’t create friction:

• Lightweight agents
• Clear user notifications
• Centralized management console
• Compliance dashboards and reporting

Quick Comparison: Top DLP Software Vendors

🏆 The 12 Best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Vendors

1. Strac

Best for: Organizations needing unified DLP across SaaS, Cloud, Endpoint, and GenAI

Overview:
Strac is a modern, AI-native DLP platform that protects sensitive data across SaaS applications (Slack, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Zendesk), cloud storage (Google Drive, OneDrive, Box), endpoints (Mac, Windows, Linux), and GenAI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini). Unlike legacy DLP vendors that focus primarily on network or endpoint, Strac provides agentless SaaS protection with real-time detection and remediation.

Key Features:

• 50+ SaaS integrations — Native connectors for Slack, Zendesk, Intercom, Salesforce, Jira, Confluence, and more
• Real-time redaction — Automatically masks sensitive data in messages and files

• GenAI DLP — Blocks sensitive data uploads to ChatGPT, Claude, and Copilot
• Data lineage tracking — Tracks corporate file origins and prevents exfiltration
• Endpoint protection — Mac, Windows, Linux with USB, clipboard, and browser upload controls
• Historical scanning — Retroactively scans existing data, not just new content

Pros:

• Broadest SaaS integration coverage
• Real-time redaction (not just alerting)
• Unified platform for SaaS + endpoint + GenAI
• Fast deployment (minutes, not months)
• Competitive pricing for mid-market

Cons:

• Newer vendor (founded 2021)
• Network DLP not a focus (SaaS-first approach)

Best Use Cases:

• Companies using multiple SaaS applications
• Organizations concerned about GenAI data leakage

• Mid-market companies needing enterprise DLP without enterprise complexity

Compliance: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, ISO 27001

‍

2. Symantec DLP (Broadcom)

Best for: Large enterprises with established on-premise infrastructure

Overview:
Symantec DLP, now owned by Broadcom, is one of the oldest and most established DLP platforms. It offers comprehensive coverage across endpoint, network, storage, and cloud. Symantec is particularly strong in regulated industries that require on-premise deployment options and have dedicated security teams to manage complex policies.

Key Features:

• Endpoint, network, storage, and cloud DLP modules
• Advanced content detection with 300+ built-in policies
• Fingerprinting for exact data matching
• Integration with Symantec endpoint protection suite
• On-premise and cloud deployment options

Pros:

• Mature, battle-tested platform
• Comprehensive coverage across all vectors
• Strong in highly regulated industries
• Extensive policy library

Cons:

• Complex deployment and management
• Legacy architecture (not cloud-native)
• Broadcom acquisition created customer uncertainty
• Expensive licensing and professional services
• Limited SaaS application coverage

Best Use Cases:

• Large enterprises with existing Symantec infrastructure
• Organizations requiring on-premise deployment
• Financial services and healthcare with strict compliance requirements

3. Microsoft Purview DLP

Best for: Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365

Overview:
Microsoft Purview (formerly Microsoft Information Protection and Compliance) provides native DLP capabilities for Microsoft 365 applications including Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. For organizations already using Microsoft E5 licenses, Purview offers integrated DLP without additional vendor costs.

Key Features:

• Native integration with Microsoft 365 apps
• Endpoint DLP for Windows devices
• Sensitive information types with trainable classifiers
• Integration with Microsoft Defender and Sentinel
• Included in Microsoft 365 E5 licensing

Pros:

• No additional cost for E5 customers
• Seamless Microsoft 365 integration
• Unified admin experience in Microsoft compliance center
• Good for Microsoft-centric environments

Cons:

• Limited coverage outside Microsoft ecosystem
• Weak SaaS DLP for non-Microsoft apps (Slack, Salesforce)
• Complex licensing tiers
• Mac and Linux support is limited
• No GenAI protection for non-Copilot tools

Best Use Cases:

• Microsoft-centric organizations
• Companies already paying for E5 licenses
• Windows endpoint environments

4. Forcepoint DLP

Best for: Organizations prioritizing user behavior analytics

Overview:
Forcepoint DLP combines traditional content-aware DLP with user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA). This approach helps identify risky user behavior patterns, not just sensitive content. Forcepoint is strong in environments where insider threat detection is a primary concern.

Key Features:

• Risk-adaptive DLP based on user behavior
• Endpoint, network, cloud, and email coverage
• Incident risk ranking to prioritize alerts
• Integration with Forcepoint CASB and web gateway
• On-premise and cloud deployment

Pros:

• Strong behavioral analytics
• Risk-based policy enforcement
• Good network DLP capabilities
• Flexible deployment options

Cons:

• Complex to configure and tune
• User interface feels dated
• Limited modern SaaS integrations
• GenAI protection requires additional products

Best Use Cases:

• Insider threat programs
• Organizations with network-centric security architecture
• Environments requiring behavior-based risk scoring

5. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP

Best for: Email-centric data protection

Overview:
Proofpoint DLP evolved from the company's email security heritage, making it particularly strong at protecting data in email communications. Proofpoint offers endpoint and cloud DLP, but its differentiation is deep email content analysis and user-centric security based on attack likelihood.

Key Features:

• Advanced email DLP with content analysis
• People-centric security model (VAP scoring)
• Cloud application protection via CASB
• Endpoint DLP for Windows and Mac
• Integration with Proofpoint email security

Pros:

• Excellent email DLP capabilities
• Strong threat intelligence integration
• Good for organizations with email-centric data flows
• User risk scoring

Cons:

• Less comprehensive SaaS coverage than specialists
• Primarily email-focused
• Limited GenAI protection
• Can be expensive for full platform

Best Use Cases:

• Organizations where email is the primary data leak vector
• Companies using Proofpoint for email security
• Legal, financial services with document-heavy email

6. Netskope

Best for: Cloud-first organizations with SASE architecture

Overview:
Netskope is a Security Service Edge (SSE) and SASE leader that includes cloud DLP as part of its platform. Netskope excels at protecting data in cloud applications through its inline proxy architecture. It's particularly strong for organizations adopting zero trust network access.

Key Features:

• Inline cloud DLP with SSL inspection
• CASB functionality for SaaS visibility
• Cloud-native architecture
• Zero trust network access (ZTNA)
• Integration with SIEM and SOAR platforms

Pros:

• Strong cloud and SaaS DLP
• Modern cloud-native architecture
• Good GenAI protection capabilities
• Part of comprehensive SASE platform

Cons:

• Requires network architecture changes
• No endpoint DLP (network-focused)
• Complex pricing
• Can introduce latency for users

Best Use Cases:

• Cloud-first organizations
• Companies implementing SASE architecture
• Environments prioritizing inline cloud DLP

7. Zscaler

Best for: Zero trust architecture with integrated DLP

Overview:
Zscaler provides cloud DLP as part of its Zero Trust Exchange platform. Like Netskope, Zscaler takes a network-centric approach, inspecting traffic inline to detect sensitive data moving to cloud applications and the internet. Zscaler is strong for organizations pursuing zero trust initiatives.

Key Features:

• Inline DLP via cloud proxy
• Exact data matching and fingerprinting
• Integration with Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA)
• Cloud-delivered architecture
• Browser isolation for sensitive data

Pros:

• Scalable cloud architecture
• Good integration with zero trust strategy
• Strong SSL inspection capabilities
• GenAI application controls

Cons:

• Network-dependent (no offline protection)
• No true endpoint DLP
• Requires Zscaler platform adoption
• Can impact network performance

Best Use Cases:

• Zero trust network implementations
• Organizations with distributed workforce
• Cloud-first enterprises

8. Trellix DLP

Best for: Organizations with legacy McAfee DLP deployments

Overview:
Trellix DLP (formerly McAfee DLP) provides endpoint, network, and cloud data protection. After the McAfee Enterprise spin-off and merger with FireEye, Trellix has been modernizing the platform while maintaining backward compatibility for existing customers.

Key Features:

• Endpoint DLP for Windows and Mac
• Network DLP with email gateway
• ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) management
• Device control and encryption
• Integration with Trellix XDR

Pros:

• Mature endpoint DLP capabilities
• Good device control features
• Familiar for McAfee customers
• Integration with broader Trellix platform

Cons:

• Legacy architecture being modernized
• Complex management interface
• Limited cloud-native SaaS protection
• No GenAI-specific capabilities

Best Use Cases:

• Existing McAfee/Trellix customers
• Organizations prioritizing endpoint control
• Environments with ePO infrastructure

9. Digital Guardian (Fortra)

Best for: Intellectual property protection

Overview:
Digital Guardian, now part of Fortra, focuses on protecting intellectual property and sensitive data from insider threats and external attacks. The platform offers both agent-based and agentless approaches, with particular strength in manufacturing, technology, and pharmaceutical industries where IP protection is critical.

Key Features:

• IP-focused data classification
• Endpoint and network DLP
• User behavior analytics
• Managed DLP service option
• Strong forensics and investigation tools

Pros:

• Strong intellectual property focus
• Good behavior analytics
• Managed service option available
• Detailed forensics capabilities

Cons:

• Complex deployment
• Limited SaaS application coverage
• No GenAI protection
• Can be resource-intensive on endpoints

Best Use Cases:

• Manufacturing and technology IP protection
• Pharmaceutical R&D data security
• Organizations wanting managed DLP services

10. Nightfall AI

Best for: API-first, developer-friendly DLP

Overview:
Nightfall AI is a cloud-native DLP platform focused on SaaS applications and cloud infrastructure. Nightfall differentiates through machine learning-based detection and an API-first approach that appeals to engineering teams. The platform integrates with popular SaaS tools and offers GenAI protection.

Key Features:

• ML-based sensitive data detection
• API and native SaaS integrations
• GitHub, Slack, Google Workspace coverage
• Developer-friendly implementation
• GenAI application protection

Pros:

• Modern, cloud-native architecture
• Strong machine learning detection
• Good developer tools and APIs
• GenAI protection capabilities

Cons:

• No endpoint DLP
• Smaller integration library than some competitors
• Primarily detection/alerting (limited remediation)
• Venture-backed startup risk

Best Use Cases:

• Engineering and developer teams
• Cloud-native organizations
• Companies prioritizing API integration

11. Teramind

Best for: User activity monitoring with DLP

Overview:
Teramind combines user activity monitoring (UAM) with DLP capabilities. The platform records user actions, detects policy violations, and can block data exfiltration. Teramind is particularly strong for insider threat programs where understanding user behavior is as important as protecting data.

Key Features:

• Comprehensive user activity monitoring
• Screen recording and playback
• Keystroke logging (configurable)
• Endpoint DLP and device control
• Productivity analytics

Pros:

• Strong insider threat capabilities
• Detailed user activity visibility
• Good for compliance investigations
• Flexible deployment options

Cons:

• Privacy concerns with extensive monitoring
• Limited SaaS DLP coverage
• No GenAI-specific protection
• Can impact user trust if not communicated properly

Best Use Cases:

• Insider threat programs
• Compliance investigations
• High-security environments requiring activity monitoring

12. Code42 Incydr

Best for: Insider risk management

Overview:
Code42 Incydr focuses specifically on insider risk detection and response. Rather than traditional content-based DLP, Incydr monitors file movements and user behavior to detect data exfiltration. The platform is designed to identify risky data exposure without blocking productivity.

Key Features:

• File activity monitoring across endpoints and cloud
• Risk indicators for insider threats
• Departing employee monitoring
• Integration with HR and SOAR platforms
• Response workflows

Pros:

• Purpose-built for insider risk
• Less intrusive than traditional DLP
• Good departing employee use case
• Fast time to value

Cons:

• Not traditional content-based DLP
• Limited sensitive data classification
• Primarily detection-focused (less prevention)
• No GenAI protection

Best Use Cases:

• Departing employee data theft prevention
• Insider risk programs
• Organizations wanting visibility without blocking

📈 DLP Market Trends for 2025

GenAI Data Protection is Now Critical

The rise of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot has created new data leak vectors that traditional DLP doesn't address. Employees paste sensitive data into AI prompts, upload documents to AI assistants, and use AI-powered coding tools that may expose source code. Modern DLP must include GenAI protection.

Cloud-Native Beats On-Premise

Organizations are abandoning complex on-premise DLP deployments in favor of cloud-native solutions that deploy in hours, not months. SaaS-first DLP platforms that protect where data actually lives — in cloud applications — are gaining market share from legacy network DLP vendors.

Unified Platforms Over Point Solutions

Security teams don't want separate tools for endpoint DLP, email DLP, cloud DLP, and GenAI protection. Platforms that provide unified visibility and policy management across all vectors are becoming the preferred choice.

Behavior Analytics Enhance Content Detection

Pure content-based DLP generates too many false positives. Leading solutions combine content analysis with user behavior to understand context — is this a departing employee? An unusual data access pattern? Risk-based approaches reduce alert fatigue.

Privacy and User Experience Matter

Heavy-handed DLP that blocks legitimate work creates friction and workarounds. Modern DLP emphasizes user education, just-in-time notifications, and contextual blocking that protects data without destroying productivity.

🧭 How to Select the Best DLP Solution for Your Organization

Step 1: Map Your Data Landscape

Before evaluating vendors, understand where your sensitive data exists:

• Which SaaS applications contain sensitive data?
• What endpoints (Windows, Mac, Linux) need protection?
• Where is cloud storage used (Google Drive, OneDrive, Box)?
• Are employees using GenAI tools?

Step 2: Define Your Primary Use Cases

Different DLP products excel at different scenarios:

• SaaS data protection → Strac, Nightfall
• Endpoint control → Symantec, Forcepoint, Trellix
• Email protection → Proofpoint
• Network/zero trust → Netskope, Zscaler
• Insider threat → Teramind, Code42
• Microsoft environments → Microsoft Purview

Step 3: Evaluate Integration Requirements

List the applications and infrastructure the DLP must integrate with:

• SaaS applications (Slack, Salesforce, Zendesk)
• Cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP)
• Identity providers (Okta, Azure AD)
• SIEM/SOAR platforms
• Existing security tools

Step 4: Consider Deployment Complexity

Ask vendors about typical deployment timelines:

• How long until basic policies are enforced?
• What resources are required from your team?
• Is professional services engagement required?

Cloud-native solutions typically deploy in days; legacy platforms may take months.

Step 5: Test with a Proof of Concept

Never buy DLP without a POC that tests:

• Detection accuracy on your actual data
• False positive rates in your environment
• User experience and notification quality
• Administrative ease of policy management
• Reporting and compliance capabilities

Step 6: Evaluate Total Cost of Ownership

DLP pricing varies significantly:

• Per-user licensing vs. per-integration vs. per-API call
• Professional services for deployment
• Ongoing management overhead
• Training and enablement costs

Step 7: Assess Vendor Viability

Consider the vendor's market position:

• Financial stability and funding
• Customer references in your industry
• Product roadmap alignment with your needs
• Support quality and responsiveness

❓ Frequently Asked Questions on DLP Software Vendors in 2026

What is the best DLP software?

The best DLP software depends on your environment and requirements. For SaaS and GenAI protection, Strac offers the broadest coverage. For Microsoft-centric organizations, Microsoft Purview provides native integration. For network-based zero trust, Netskope or Zscaler are strong choices. Enterprises with legacy infrastructure often choose Symantec or Forcepoint.

What are the three types of DLP?

The three main types of DLP are:

1. Endpoint DLP — Protects data on laptops, desktops, and mobile devices
2. Network DLP — Monitors data in transit across network traffic
3. Cloud DLP — Protects data in SaaS applications and cloud storage

Modern platforms often combine all three types for comprehensive coverage.

How much does DLP software cost?

DLP pricing varies widely:

• Microsoft Purview — Included in Microsoft 365 E5 ($57/user/month)
• Enterprise DLP platforms — $15–50 per user per month
• SaaS-first DLP — Often priced per integration or API usage
• Legacy on-premise — Significant upfront licensing plus maintenance

Total cost of ownership should include deployment, management, and training.

Does DLP protect against GenAI data leaks?

Traditional DLP solutions do not protect against GenAI data leaks. Employees can paste sensitive information into ChatGPT prompts or upload documents to AI tools without detection. Modern DLP platforms like Strac, Netskope, and Zscaler now include GenAI application controls. If GenAI protection is important, verify the vendor specifically supports ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and similar tools.

What is the difference between DLP and CASB?

DLP (Data Loss Prevention) focuses on identifying and protecting sensitive data content — detecting SSNs, credit cards, and confidential documents regardless of where they exist.

CASB (Cloud Access Security Broker) focuses on visibility and control over cloud application usage — who is using which apps, with what permissions, and from where.

Many modern platforms combine DLP and CASB capabilities. DLP provides the content inspection; CASB provides the application context.

How long does DLP take to deploy?

Deployment time varies dramatically:

• Cloud-native SaaS DLP — Hours to days for basic protection
• Endpoint DLP — Days to weeks depending on fleet size
• Enterprise on-premise DLP — Weeks to months for full deployment

Start with monitoring mode to understand data flows before enabling blocking.

What compliance regulations require DLP?

While no regulation explicitly mandates "DLP," many require data protection controls that DLP helps achieve:

• HIPAA — Requires safeguards for protected health information (PHI)
• PCI-DSS — Requires protection of cardholder data
• GDPR — Requires appropriate security for personal data
• SOC 2 — Requires access controls and monitoring
• CCPA — Requires reasonable security for consumer data

DLP provides technical controls and audit evidence for these requirements.

Can DLP prevent insider threats?

DLP is one component of insider threat prevention, but not a complete solution. DLP can:

• Detect sensitive data exfiltration attempts
• Block unauthorized transfers
• Alert on policy violations

For comprehensive insider threat programs, combine DLP with user activity monitoring (UAM), identity analytics, and security awareness training.

‍